In this blog post Alpaca vs Phi-3 for Instruction Fine-Tuning in Practice we will unpack the trade-offs between these two popular paths to instruction-tuned models, show practical steps to fine-tune them, and help you choose the right option for your team.
Instruction tuning teaches a general language model to follow human-written tasks (“Write a summary”, “Generate SQL”) reliably. Alpaca popularised low-cost instruction-tuning on top of a 7B base model. Phi-3 represents a new generation of small language models (SLMs) engineered for efficient reasoning and high utility per parameter. This post keeps things practical: a high-level comparison first, then concrete steps and code.
High-level overview
Alpaca is a recipe: start with a capable base model (originally LLaMA-7B), fine-tune it on a curated set of instruction–response pairs (about 52k), and get a model that follows prompts pretty well for its size. It proved you could get strong instruction-following performance with modest compute using methods like LoRA.
Phi-3 is a family of small language models trained by Microsoft on high-quality, reasoning-focused data. Out of the box, Phi-3 models come with strong instruction-following and reasoning capabilities and can be efficiently fine-tuned for domain tasks. They aim to deliver better accuracy-per-dollar and lower latency than older 7B baselines.
The technology behind instruction tuning
- Transformer decoder models: Both Alpaca-style and Phi-3 models are decoder-only transformers. They predict the next token conditioned on the prompt.
- Supervised fine-tuning (SFT): We show the model many examples of (instruction, optional input) → (ideal response). This aligns behaviour to follow tasks.
- Adapters with LoRA/QLoRA: Instead of updating all weights, we train small low-rank adapter matrices on quantized base weights. This slashes GPU memory while preserving quality.
- Formatting and prompting: Consistent prompt templates, chat roles, and system messages are crucial. Instruction models can be brittle to format drift.
- Evaluation loops: After fine-tuning, evaluate with held-out tasks, spot-check for factuality and safety, and iterate.
What is Alpaca, really?
Alpaca is a Stanford research project that fine-tuned the original LLaMA-7B on ~52k instruction–response pairs generated via a larger model. The appeal was its simplicity and cost efficiency. Key points:
- Base model: Originally LLaMA-7B (older architecture and license constraints). Many modern reproductions use Llama 2/3 or open-llama variants.
- Data: Short, diverse instructions. Great for general instruction-following; limited on complex reasoning.
- Method: LoRA adapters on top of the base with a simple prompt template.
- Pros: Extremely accessible recipe; easy to replicate; runs on commodity GPUs.
- Cons: Results depend heavily on the base model; older Alpaca stacks may lag in safety, reasoning, and license suitability for commercial use. Check base-model terms.
What is Phi-3?
Phi-3 is Microsoft’s small language model family, engineered to be compact but strong at reasoning and instruction following. It’s trained on high-quality, curated and synthetic data emphasizing correctness, explanations, and alignment. Highlights:
- Sizes: Multiple sizes (e.g., “mini” class around a few billion parameters). Good fit for edge and low-latency server inference.
- Quality focus: Emphasis on textbook-quality and safety-aware data, yielding robust out-of-the-box behavior.
- Efficiency: Strong accuracy-per-parameter and low memory footprint; ideal for QLoRA fine-tunes.
- Availability: Offered through common hubs and cloud catalogs. Review model-specific licensing and usage terms for your deployment context.
Head-to-head comparison
- Data quality: Alpaca’s original dataset is simple and synthetic; it may require augmentation for domain depth. Phi-3’s training corpus emphasizes reasoning and safety, often reducing the need for large fine-tune sets.
- Performance per parameter: Modern Phi-3 variants typically outperform older 7B Alpaca-style models on reasoning-heavy tasks at similar or smaller sizes.
- Latency and cost: Phi-3’s small sizes fine-tune and serve cheaply (especially with 4-bit quantization). An Alpaca stack on older 7B bases may need more VRAM and still underperform.
- Safety and alignment: Phi-3 benefits from curated data and alignment; Alpaca-style models depend on your data sanitation and the base model’s guardrails.
- Ecosystem: Alpaca is a recipe you can apply to many bases (Llama 2/3, Mistral). Phi-3 has an emerging ecosystem with good support in popular tooling.
- Licensing: Alpaca itself is a method; your actual license comes from the base model and data. Phi-3 has model-specific terms; verify commercial usage rights before shipping.
When to choose one over the other
- Choose Alpaca-style if: You want a reproducible, transparent SFT recipe on a base you already vetted (e.g., Llama 2/3), you need full control over data and prompting, and you accept to build your own guardrails.
- Choose Phi-3 if: You want strong default reasoning and efficient inference, plan to deploy on modest GPUs or edge, and prefer starting from a modern, safety-aware SLM with smaller fine-tuning demands.
Practical fine-tuning steps (applies to both)
- Define your goals: Which tasks, constraints, and success metrics (accuracy, latency, memory)?
- Assemble data: Start with an instruction dataset (e.g., Alpaca format). Add domain examples and counterexamples (edge cases). Balance breadth and depth.
- Choose a base: A modern, instruction-capable base saves time. If you need 7B+, consider newer architectures; otherwise Phi-3 “mini”-class can be plenty.
- Pick a prompt template: Consistency matters. Use a stable chat format for both training and inference.
- Train with QLoRA: 4-bit quantization + LoRA adapters keeps VRAM low with minimal quality loss.
- Evaluate: Use a held-out set; measure exact matches, BLEU/ROUGE for text tasks, and human spot-checks for correctness and tone.
- Iterate: Patch data holes, adjust templates, tune hyperparameters (rank, alpha, learning rate).
- Harden: Add safety filters, constrain output where needed, and add monitoring.
Minimal code: Phi-3 QLoRA SFT
# pip install -U transformers datasets peft accelerate bitsandbytes trl
import torch
from datasets import load_dataset
from transformers import (AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer, BitsAndBytesConfig)
from peft import LoraConfig
from trl import SFTTrainer, SFTTrainingArguments
model_id = "microsoft/Phi-3-mini-4k-instruct" # Check license/terms
bnb_config = BitsAndBytesConfig(
load_in_4bit=True,
bnb_4bit_quant_type="nf4",
bnb_4bit_compute_dtype=torch.bfloat16,
)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
model_id,
device_map="auto",
quantization_config=bnb_config,
)
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
dataset = load_dataset("tatsu-lab/alpaca", split="train") # replace with your data
# Format: simple instruction → response. Keep template consistent.
def format_example(ex):
instr = ex.get("instruction", "")
input_ = ex.get("input", "").strip()
output = ex.get("output", "")
if input_:
prompt = f"<|user|>\n{instr}\n\n{input_}\n<|assistant|>\n"
else:
prompt = f"<|user|>\n{instr}\n<|assistant|>\n"
return {"text": prompt + output}
train_data = dataset.map(format_example, remove_columns=dataset.column_names)
peft_config = LoraConfig(
r=16, lora_alpha=32, lora_dropout=0.05, target_modules=["q_proj","v_proj"], bias="none"
)
args = SFTTrainingArguments(
output_dir="./phi3-instruct-lora",
per_device_train_batch_size=4,
gradient_accumulation_steps=4,
num_train_epochs=2,
learning_rate=2e-4,
bf16=True,
logging_steps=20,
save_steps=500,
optim="paged_adamw_8bit",
)
trainer = SFTTrainer(
model=model,
tokenizer=tokenizer,
peft_config=peft_config,
args=args,
train_dataset=train_data,
dataset_text_field="text",
)
trainer.train()
# Save adapter
trainer.model.save_pretrained("./phi3-instruct-lora/adapter")
Minimal code: Alpaca-style SFT on a Llama base
Many teams use the Alpaca recipe on a modern Llama base (e.g., Llama 2/3) for better licenses and quality than the original LLaMA-7B. Replace the model ID with one you’re approved to use.
# pip install -U transformers datasets peft accelerate bitsandbytes trl
import torch
from datasets import load_dataset
from transformers import (AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer, BitsAndBytesConfig)
from peft import LoraConfig
from trl import SFTTrainer, SFTTrainingArguments
model_id = "meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf" # Accept license on HF before use
bnb_config = BitsAndBytesConfig(
load_in_4bit=True,
bnb_4bit_quant_type="nf4",
bnb_4bit_compute_dtype=torch.bfloat16,
)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
model_id,
device_map="auto",
quantization_config=bnb_config,
)
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id, use_fast=False)
alpaca = load_dataset("tatsu-lab/alpaca", split="train")
def alpaca_format(ex):
instr, inp, out = ex["instruction"], ex.get("input",""), ex["output"]
prompt = (
"### Instruction:\n" + instr + "\n\n" +
("### Input:\n" + inp + "\n\n" if inp else "") +
"### Response:\n"
)
return {"text": prompt + out}
train_data = alpaca.map(alpaca_format, remove_columns=alpaca.column_names)
peft_config = LoraConfig(r=16, lora_alpha=32, lora_dropout=0.05, target_modules=["q_proj","v_proj"])
args = SFTTrainingArguments(
output_dir="./llama2-alpaca-lora",
per_device_train_batch_size=4,
gradient_accumulation_steps=4,
num_train_epochs=2,
learning_rate=2e-4,
bf16=True,
)
trainer = SFTTrainer(
model=model,
tokenizer=tokenizer,
peft_config=peft_config,
args=args,
train_dataset=train_data,
dataset_text_field="text",
)
trainer.train()
trainer.model.save_pretrained("./llama2-alpaca-lora/adapter")
Hardware and cost notes
- VRAM: Phi-3 “mini” QLoRA fine-tunes comfortably on a single 8–16 GB GPU. A 7B Llama base often prefers 16–24 GB for smoother throughput.
- Throughput: 4-bit quantization and gradient accumulation keep costs low with minimal quality trade-offs.
- Serving: Phi-3 “mini” can hit sub-50 ms/token on modest GPUs. Quantized 7B models can also serve quickly but may require more memory.
Evaluation, safety, and reliability
- Task accuracy: Construct a held-out set aligned to your real user prompts. Track exact match, ROUGE/BLEU, and latency.
- Behavioral checks: Red-team for jailbreaks, harmful content, and data leakage. Add rule-based or model-based filters if needed.
- Regression tests: Save prompts that broke previous versions; run them in CI before every release.
- Human-in-the-loop: For critical use-cases (e.g., healthcare, finance), require human review and detailed logging.
Deployment tips
- Keep the training and inference prompt template identical.
- Export adapters separately; merge only when you need a single artifact.
- Use half-precision or 4-bit for serving to fit tighter memory budgets.
- Add simple guardrails: max output tokens, stop sequences, and content filters.
- Monitor drift: Track acceptance rates, objectionable content flags, and response length distributions over time.
Decision checklist
- If you need strong reasoning at low cost and quick time-to-value: start with Phi-3 and light QLoRA.
- If you have a vetted 7B+ base model license and want full control over data/prompting: Alpaca-style SFT is solid and predictable.
- If latency and memory are tight (edge/CPU/GPU-lite): Phi-3 “mini” class is often the easiest path.
- If you must align to a specific enterprise policy framework: pick the base with the clearest license and responsible AI posture, then fine-tune.
Conclusion
Alpaca made instruction fine-tuning accessible; Phi-3 makes high-quality, efficient instruction models practical for production. If you’re starting fresh and want the best accuracy-per-dollar, Phi-3 is a great default. If you already have a licensed Llama stack and a strong MLOps pipeline, the Alpaca recipe remains a reliable, transparent approach. In both cases, success hinges on your data quality, prompt consistency, and a tight evaluation loop.
Discover more from CPI Consulting
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.